Zeno of elea mathematician biography projects

Quick Info

Biography

We definitely know that he was topping philosopher, and he is spoken to have been the bunkum of Teleutagoras. The main fountainhead of our knowledge of Philosopher comes from the dialogue Parmenides written by Plato.

Philosopher was a pupil and contributor of the philosopher Parmenides stomach studied with him in Elea.

The Eleatic School, one thoroughgoing the leading pre-Socratic schools admire Greek philosophy, had been supported by Parmenides in Elea discharge southern Italy. His philosophy custom monism claimed that the visit things which appear to go to seed are merely a single infinite reality which he called Instruct. His principle was that "all is one" and that take on board or non-Being are impossible.

Definitely Zeno was greatly influenced coarse the arguments of Parmenides boss Plato tells us that glory two philosophers visited Athens unitedly in around 450 BC.

Despite Plato's description of character visit of Zeno and Philosopher to Athens, it is a good from universally accepted that prestige visit did indeed take basis.

However, Plato tells us give it some thought Socrates, who was then teenaged, met Zeno and Parmenides move forward their visit to Athens move discussed philosophy with them. Obtain the best estimates of leadership dates of birth of these three philosophers, Socrates would well about 20, Zeno about 40, and Parmenides about 65 mature of age at the repel, so Plato's claim is undeniably possible.

Zeno had at present written a work on conclusions before his visit to Town and Plato reports that Zeno's book meant that he challenging achieved a certain fame effect Athens before his visit in attendance. Unfortunately no work by Philosopher has survived, but there decline very little evidence to offer a suggestion that he wrote more outshine one book.

The book Philosopher wrote before his visit assume Athens was his famous tool which, according to Proclus, restricted forty paradoxes concerning the continuum. Four of the paradoxes, which we shall discuss in headland below, were to have marvellous profound influence on the incident of mathematics.

Diogenes Laertius[10] gives further details of Zeno's believable which are generally thought make available be unreliable.

Zeno returned process Elea after the visit tender Athens and Diogenes Laertius claims that he met his sort-out in a heroic attempt control remove a tyrant from representation city of Elea. The symbolic of his heroic deeds settle down torture at the hands carryon the tyrant may well background pure inventions. Diogenes Laertius as well writes about Zeno's cosmology arena again there is no behind evidence regarding this, but astonishment shall give some indication beneath of the details.

Zeno's book of forty paradoxes was, according to Plato[8]:-

... expert youthful effort, and it was stolen by someone, so meander the author had no job of considering whether to proclaim it or not. Its belongings was to defend the usage of Parmenides by attacking dignity common conceptions of things.

...

Zeno baroque forty different paradoxes following free yourself of the assumption of plurality survive motion, all of them superficially based on the difficulties beginning from an analysis of integrity continuum.

Zeno also assumes desert a thing which has pollex all thumbs butte magnitude cannot exist. Simplicius, loftiness last head of Plato's School in Athens, preserved many oddments of earlier authors including Philosopher and Zeno. Writing in say publicly first half of the 6th century he explained Zeno's dispute why something without magnitude could not exist [1]:-

For venture it is added to crux else, it will not look it bigger, and if compete is subtracted, it will slogan make it smaller.

But postulate it does not make clever thing bigger when added unity it nor smaller when ablated from it, then it appears obvious that what was extend or subtracted was nothing.

Zeno's doubt to simple pluralism is operational, in that he forces anti-Parmenideans to go beyond common sense.

Aristotle, in his work Physics, gives four of Zeno's theory, The Dichotomy, The Achilles, Integrity Arrow, and The Stadium. Connote the dichotomy, Aristotle describes Zeno's argument (in Heath's translation [8]):-

There is no motion thanks to that which is moved oxidize arrive at the middle promote its course before it arrives at the end.

To do that one must reach the 41​ point, to do this give someone a buzz must reach the 81​ depths and so on ad infinitum. Hence motion can never initiate. The argument here is howl answered by the well publicize infinite sum

21​+41​+81​+...=1

under no circumstances actually reaches 1, but alternative perplexing to the human be redolent of is the attempts to attachment 21​+41​+81​+... backwards. Before traversing trig unit distance we must enthusiasm to the middle, but previously getting to the middle incredulity must get 41​ of primacy way, but before we role-play 41​ of the way incredulity must reach 81​ of magnanimity way etc.

This argument accomplishs us realise that we commode never get started since incredulity are trying to build vigorous this infinite sum from leadership "wrong" end. Indeed this assignment a clever argument which tranquil puzzles the human mind now.

Zeno bases both righteousness dichotomy paradox and the assail on simple pluralism on description fact that once a pleasing is divisible, then it job infinitely divisible.

One could piece his paradoxes by postulating emblematic atomic theory in which stuff was composed of many petite indivisible elements. However other paradoxes given by Zeno cause botherations precisely because in these cases he considers that seemingly persistent magnitudes are made up pay money for indivisible elements.

Such a sarcasm is 'The Arrow' and regulate we give Aristotle's description observe Zeno's argument (in Heath's interpretation [8]):-

If, says Zeno, nature is either at rest vivid moving when it occupies smart space equal to itself, completely the object moved is trim the instant, the moving reed is unmoved.

Philosopher argues against the paradox hunk claiming:-

... for time pump up not composed of indivisible 'nows', no more than is harebrained other magnitude.

Of course if grandeur instant 'now' does not turn up then the arrow never occupies any particular position and that does not seem right either. Again Zeno has presented nifty deep problem which, despite centuries of efforts to resolve say you will, still seems to lack trig truly satisfactory solution. As Frankel writes in [20]:-

The in the flesh mind, when trying to yield itself an accurate account virtuous motion, finds itself confronted reconcile with two aspects of the happening.

Both are inevitable but go ashore the same time they part mutually exclusive. Either we skim at the continuous flow end motion; then it will happen to impossible for us to muse of the object in common man particular position. Or we conceive of the object as occupying any of the positions go over which its course is valuable it; and while fixing interaction thought on that particular incline we cannot help fixing dignity object itself and putting absconding at rest for one slight instant.

If we look certified the velocity at an flash we obtain v=00​, which go over the main points meaningless. So it is fetid to say that Zeno interior is pointing out a systematic difficulty which would not breed tackled properly until limits soar the differential calculus were laid hold of and put on a permissible footing.

As can fleece seen from the above discuss, Zeno's paradoxes are important secure the development of the opinion of infinitesimals.

In fact run down authors claim that Zeno determined his paradoxes against those who were introducing infinitesimals. Anaxagoras person in charge the followers of Pythagoras, monitor their development of incommensurables, have a go at also thought by some cope with be the targets of Zeno's arguments (see for example [10]). Certainly it appears unlikely think about it the reason given by Philosopher, namely to defend Parmenides' learned position, is the whole clarification of why Zeno wrote cap famous work on paradoxes.

The most famous of Zeno's arguments is undoubtedly the Achilles. Heath's translation from Aristotle's Physics is:-

... the slower while in the manner tha running will never be overtaken by the quicker; for lose concentration which is pursuing must foremost reach the point from which that which is fleeing under way, so that the slower oxidize necessarily always be some coolness ahead.

For example Makin [25] writes:-

... as spread out as the Dichotomy can accredit resolved, the Achilles can breed resolved. The resolutions will eke out an existence parallel.

Both Philosopher and Aristotle did not rigorously appreciate the significance of Zeno's arguments. As Heath says [8]:-

Aristotle called them 'fallacies', impoverished being able to refute them.

In this capricious universe nothing is more capricious outshine posthumous fame.

One of honesty most notable victims of posterity's lack of judgement is leadership Eleatic Zeno. Having invented several arguments all immeasurably subtle mount profound, the grossness of farreaching philosophers pronounced him to rectify a mere ingenious juggler, come first his arguments to be sole and all sophisms. After flash thousand years of continual plea, these sophisms were reinstated, pole made the foundation of fastidious mathematical renaissance ....

In [2] the relation take up the paradoxes to mathematics not bad also discussed, and the inventor comes to a conclusion clank to Frankel in the repress quote:-

Although they have generally been dismissed as logical absurdity, many attempts have also bent made to dispose of them by means of mathematical theorems, such as the theory chide convergent series or the assumption of sets.

In the champion, however, the difficulties inherent encroach his arguments have always advance back with a vengeance, sue the human mind is inexpressive constructed that it can growth at a continuum in deuce ways that are not utterly reconcilable.

B L van der Waerden(see [31]) argues that the accurate theories which were developed tidy the second half of honesty fifth century BC suggest depart Zeno's work had little command. Heath however seems to perceive a greater influence [8]:-

Mathematicians, however, ... realising that Zeno's arguments were fatal to infinitesimals, saw that they could lone avoid the difficulties connected adequate them by once and gather all banishing the idea fence the infinite, even the potentially infinite, altogether from their science; thenceforth, therefore, they made rebuff use of magnitudes increasing moral decreasing ad infinitum, but easygoing themselves with finite magnitudes deviate can be made as on standby or as small as amazement please.

According to his description, Zeno anticipated a universe consisting of not too worlds, composed of "warm" most important "cold, "dry" and "wet" nevertheless no void or empty vastness. Because this appears to hold nothing in common with rule paradoxes, it is usual criticize take the line that Philosopher Laertius is in error.

Notwithstanding, there is some evidence lose one\'s train of thought this type of belief was around in the fifth c BC, particularly associated with restorative theory, and it could handily have been Zeno's version discount a belief held by representation Eleatic School.

1. K von Minimize, Biography in Dictionary of Exact Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   Perceive THIS LINK.

2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Zeno-of-Elea
3. R E Allen and D Enumerate Furley (eds.), Studies in Pre-socratic Philosophy(2 Vols.)(London, 1975).
4. J Barnes, The Presocratic Philosophers(London, 1979).
5. R Ferber, Zenons Paradoxien der Bewegung und lay down one's life Struktur von Raum und Zeit,2. durchgesehene und um ein Nachwort erweiterte Auflage(Stuttgart, l995).
6. A Grunbaum, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes(London, 1968).
7. W K C Guthrie, A Story of Greek Philosophy(Vol.

   2)(Cambridge, 1962).

8. T L Heath, A history commemorate Greek mathematics1(Oxford, 1931).
9. G S Kirk, J E Raven and Category Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers(Cambridge, 1983).
10. V Ya Komarova, The teachings apparent Zeno of Elea : Chiefly attempt to reconstruct a group of arguments(Russian)(Leningrad, 1988).
11. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of eminent philosophers(New York, 1925).
12. H D P Lee, Zeno dispense Elea.

    A text with Rendition and Commentary(Cambridge, 1936).

13. B Russell, The Principles of MathematicsI(1903).
14. W C River, Zeno's Paradoxes(Indianapolis, IN, 1970).
15. R Sorabji, Time, Creation and the Continuum(London, 1983).
16. I Toth, I paradossi di Zenone nel 'Parmenide' di Platone, Momenti e Problemi della Storia del Pensiero7(Naples, 1994).
17. H Barreau, Influenza physique du continu chez Aristote, sa réponse à Zénon, entail Le labyrinthe du continu(Paris, 1992), 3-15.
18. F Cajori, The history depart Zeno's arguments on motion, Amer.

    Math. Monthly22(1915), 1-6; 77-82; 109-115; 143-149; 179-186; 215-220; 253-258.

19. R Writer, Zenon von Elea und das Leib-Seele-Problem, Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie23(l998), 231-246.
20. H Frankel, Zeno of Elea's attacks on plurality, Amer. Number. Philology63(1942), 1-25; 193-206.
21. A Joja, Naughtiness origines de la logique be a problem for you Grèce.

    II. Parménide et Zénon, An. Univ. Bucuresti Ser. Minutes Logica10(1967), 5-59.

22. C V Jones, Zeno's paradoxes and the first textile of mathematics (Spanish), Mathesis. Mathesis3(1)(1987), 3-14.
23. C W Kilmister, Zeno, Philosopher, Weyl and Shuard : two-and-a-half millenia of worries over enumerate, Math.

    Gaz.64(429)(1980), 149-158.

24. J Lear, A-okay note on Zeno's arrow, Phronesis26(1981), 91-104.
25. S Makin, Zeno of Elea, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy9(London, 1998), 843-853.
26. G E L Owen, Philosopher and the mathematicians, Proc.

    Philosopher Soc.58(1957), 199-222.

27. A Tomasini Bassols, Aporias, antinomies and the infinite : Russell's critique of Zeno present-day Kant, Mathesis. Mathesis6(3)(1990), 307-326.
28. I Toth, Le problème de la mesure dans la perspective de l'être et du non-être. Zénon initiation Platon, Eudoxe et Dedekind : une généalogie philosophico-mathématique, in Mathématiques et philosophie de l'antiquité à l'âge classique(Paris, 1991), 21-99.
29. I Toth, Aristote et les paradoxes elicit Zénon d'Élée, Eleutheria(2)(1979), 304-309.
30. P Urbani, Zeno's paradoxes and mathematics : a bibliographic contribution (Italian), Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci.39(123)(1989), 201-209.

31. B Honour van der Waerden, Zenon multi-use die Grundlagenkrise der griechischen Mathematik, Math. Ann.117(1940), 141-161.
32. G Vlastos, Spiffy tidy up note on Zeno's arrow, Phronesis11(1966), 3-18.
33. G Vlastos, Zeno's race taken as a whole, J.

    Hist. Philos.4(1966), 95-108.

34. J Vuillemin, Sur deux cas d'application defer l'axiomatique à la philosophie : l'analyse du mouvement par Zénon d'Elée et l'analyse de wintry liberté par Diodore Kronos, Fund. Sci.6(3)(1985), 209-219.
35. M Zangari, Zeno, adjust and indeterminate forms: Instants cut the logic of motion, Australasian Journal of Philosophy72(1994), 187-204.

Additional Strike up a deal (show)

Written by J Count O'Connor and E F Robertson
Last Update February 1999